Domestic Asset Protection Trusts—available only in a small number of states (19)—are a formidable planning strategy that legally shields assets from third-party liability (including spouses in a divorce proceeding) and lawsuits while permitting settlors (the person establishing the trust) to retain some control over the trust assets and enjoy a discretionary benefit during their lifetime. South Dakota has one of the oldest and most progressive self-settled domestic asset protection provisions in the United States. With its two year “look back” fraudulent conveyance statute, South Dakota has one of the shortest in the country (Delaware has a four-year fraudulent conveyance statute).

In the December 2020 issue of Trusts & Estates Magazine, authors Mark Merric, Daniel G. Worthington, and John E. Sullivan closely and objectively examined domestic asset protection trust statutes in the context of various factors including a state’s discretionary support statute, alter-ego statute, and the DAPT statute.  Of note, South Dakota is the only state appearing in the first tier in all three comparative data point categories, while Delaware, Wyoming and Alaska fell to second tier or below in at least one of the three categories. This well supported and objective conclusion again accentuates the vital importance of selecting the proper trust jurisdiction in the planning process.

Highlighting the recent and very important South Dakota Supreme Court case involving asset protection, the authors note,

“The Supreme Court of South Dakota in In re Cleopatra Cameron Gift Trust ‘rejected even the specter of an argument that would allow support creditors to reach trust funds protected by a spendthrift provision.’ A California judgment pierced the spendthrift provision of third-party trust moved to South Dakota by the grantor. South Dakota rejected the enforcement of a California claim in South Dakota, where the legislature has rejected such enforcement. As such, the South Dakota Supreme Court held that a South Dakota Court wasn’t required to submit to a California judgment to compel payments from a trust because the method of self-executing enforcement wasn’t authorized by South Dakota law.” [1]

Click here for the full article: “Best Situs for DAPTs in 2021.”

Terry Prendergast, one of South Dakota’s most respected and prolific trust attorneys who has worked on the creation and modification of South Dakota modern trust law for several years, observes that,

“This latest article again makes clear that considering overall state policy and potential challenges, both the statutes in South Dakota and the South Dakota judiciary as shown in the Cleopatra Cameron case make South Dakota the jurisdiction of choice for the best asset protection.  While some states may be with South Dakota in the top tier of one of the features (a) discretionary support trust statutes (b) anti alter ego statutes and (c) DAPT statutes, South Dakota stands alone in the top tier of all three categories, and with the Cameron case recently decided, the judiciary follows this strong public policy that a grantor can determine to protect trust assets from a beneficiaries’ creditors.  The legislative and judicial support coupled with the strong fiscal policy and no state income, estate or gift taxes make South Dakota a jurisdiction of choice for situsing trusts.”

Trusts & Estates Magazine’s findings regarding South Dakota’s domestic asset protection trust statute are particularly compelling when considered in conjunction with the fact that South Dakota…

  • Is the most fiscally sound among all top tier trust jurisdictions, a vitally important consideration as we continue to deal with the economic impact of the pandemic.
  • Is generally regarded by most practitioners and academics, including Steve Oshins, a Nevada attorney, as being the best Dynasty Trust state and having the best Decanting Statute in the nation.
  • Unequivocally has the most robust privacy laws in the country, as pointed out by an article appearing in the January 2020 edition of Trusts & Estates Magazine comparing U.S. trust jurisdictions wherein the author noted, “Of the top tier trust jurisdictions, South Dakota has the best trust privacy laws.”
  • Is one of only two top tier trust jurisdictions with a Community Property Trust, a compelling tax planning tool for spouses.
  • Is the only state in the country with the Family Advisor, referred to as a “Trust Protector Light.”
  • Has one of the lowest insurance premium taxes in the nation at 8 basis points.

When all of these attributes are considered in the aggregate, South Dakota clearly emerges as the superior trust jurisdiction in the nation for both domestic and international families seeking sophisticated trust solutions. Be sure to review our well-researched chart comparing the leading U.S. trust jurisdictions, with a particular emphasis on areas that clearly distinguish South Dakota as the best trust jurisdiction in the overall analysis.

For more information on domestic asset protection and other modern trust laws, please contact Bridgeford Trust via our contact page.

 

[1] In re Cleopatra Cameron Gift Trust, 219 S.D. 35 (2019).

© Copyright 2024 - Bridgeford Trust Company

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal and/or tax advice for any individual case or situation. The information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. All information and material appearing on bridgefordtrust.com is copyrighted. Reproduction in whole or in part is not permitted without written permission.
Subscribe To Our Blog
You are now leaving Bridgeford Trust Company's website and are being redirected to a website that is external to and independent of Bridgeford Trust Company.